The source is opendata from Nottingham and the data refers to a physical entity- so why revert it except to enforce a point of etiquett? The criterion of usefulness is not valid. I thought the whole point of entering data is that someone somewhere will find a use for it - you might not see its usefulness, but how can you know if it's not of some use to someone else? Contact the user and try to engage them - not piss them off by removing their hard work
Regards Brian On 29 July 2014 21:51, SK53 <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't need to say much more, other than it's an undiscussed import and if > we'd thought it would be useful could have done it anytime in the past 18 > months. > > Changeset is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24412110 > > Will plan to revert in 1 days time if no further action by the mapper. > > Jerry > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
