Actually, this type of import would have been very useful for my own project which uses OSM data for 3D maps. I was a little miffed to see it was simply reverted with no discussion. Good detailed data such as this is lacking very much in the UK, and we're very far behind other countries such as Germany. This sort of action I fear only scares others off from doing the same thing.
Tony On 30 July 2014 19:12, Brian Prangle <[email protected]> wrote: > The source is opendata from Nottingham and the data refers to a physical > entity- so why revert it except to enforce a point of etiquett? The > criterion of usefulness is not valid. I thought the whole point of entering > data is that someone somewhere will find a use for it - you might not see > its usefulness, but how can you know if it's not of some use to someone > else? Contact the user and try to engage them - not piss them off by > removing their hard work > > Regards > > Brian > > > On 29 July 2014 21:51, SK53 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Don't need to say much more, other than it's an undiscussed import and if >> we'd thought it would be useful could have done it anytime in the past 18 >> months. >> >> Changeset is : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24412110 >> >> Will plan to revert in 1 days time if no further action by the mapper. >> >> Jerry >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-GB mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
