The only thing that surprises me here is how long Math carried on with this. With no pleasure I say "I told you so".
There was no way this was going through, a single objection by an OSM dinosaur and DWG will overrule. And Andy I am surprised at you quoting a wiki - I though you didn't believe in such crowd sourced projects. As said before the Mech Edit policy is a joke. No-one has ever made an mech edit and followed it. DWG don't want change, they like bad data. If we had a policy that people that wrote it actually used to make mech edits with we actually might get somewhere. Otherwise the options are to do nothing or break the rules and just do it anyway. The unofficial rule is if no-one notices it is ok but addressing forthcoming/potential changes in the mailing list will always have an objection. -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/No-more-voting-on-mechanical-edits-tp5827513p5827654.html Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
