This page gives a bit of background info about these ORPAs on OS maps https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/about/governance/foi/questions/2011/0041.html
--colin On 2016-02-13 21:10, Nick Whitelegg wrote: > Hello Dudley, > > Not sure if it's standard but I use either "designation=orpa" if there's > explicit evidence of it being one, or "suspected=orpa" if there isn't (e.g. a > 'green lane' which is unsignposted but has evidence of regular foot/horse > use). > > Nick > > ------------------------- > > FROM: Dudley Ibbett <[email protected]> > SENT: 13 February 2016 14:57 > TO: [email protected] > SUBJECT: Re: [Talk-GB] Other Routes With Public Access > > Hi > > I came across a paved single lane "road" on a recent walk that was sign > posted in both directions as a "Public Road" It makes a loop between two > "unclassified" roads. > Functionally, is seems to be a service route for an isolated farm that sits > at the top of the loop, although it would make quite an useful link road > between the two "unclassified" roads . I crossed it at the top of the loop > so I don't know what there was with regards to signs at each end. On the OS > 1:25 it is marked as "Other Routes With Public Access". Is there anything I > can infer from the use of the term "Public Road". i.e foot, horse, bicycle, > vehicle = yes/no? How are people tagging the "designation" of such routes, > i.e. are people using "designation=other routes with public access"? > > Many Thanks > > Dudley > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
