What's wrong with with suggesting users use P2 over iD?
P2 has a few advantages over other editors. The only real benefit I've
noticed in iD is it prevents loading of data if user is zoomed too far
out. Something that Richard Fairhurst might be able to implement fairly
easily into P2.
I'm even less encouraged to use iD after a couple of conversations with
two of the developers (the only two?). They appear resentful to many of
the suggestions for improvement.
From memory Richard F. was a developer in the start up of iD, Is he
still involved?
Dave F.
On 25/02/2016 09:30, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Thu Feb 25 06:43:23 2016 GMT, Andy Robinson wrote:
I noticed that too Rob. Day before yesterday they all seemed to start at the
same time so I assumed it was uni students.
We spotted them as new users from the bot that reports in #osm-gb.
They were spread over the country, I assume the lecturer hasn't updated his
notes, the default if you hit the edit button as a new user is iD.
Phil (trigpoint)
From: Rob Nickerson [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 25 February 2016 00:24
To: Talk-GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] New users and P2
Hi,
Is anyone aware of any recent OSM press - we've seen a lot of new OSM mappers
in the Midlands in the last 2 days :-)
Also is Potlatch 2 still the default for new mappers as they all seem to be
using that? I though we'd switched to iD as the default across all browsers now
(although I don't remember where I read that!).
Rob
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
