I'd argue all approaches can be considered correct from the wiki:
"Add a node at the centre of the pub and add amenity=pub to it. ... If
the whole building is used for this feature and its footprint is present
in OSM, you can apply the tags on the area if you prefer."
Area obviously applies to "the whole building" but some might read it
differently :-)
If you're using the whole area style and there are elements, e.g.
roads, that don't belong to it then the whole area needs to be split
into pieces and use a site relation -- like schools?
You also need to "layer" in landuse retail on the "site" that actually
has the retail portion, and not the car park.
The building probably should be tagged as building=retail? Or
building=pub? Or both?
Cheers,
Neil
P.S. Which building is the pub?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.45246/-2.42691 /
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.45395/-2.43063
On 14/03/2016 19:51, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 11/03/2016 17:26, SK53 wrote:
A quick query on IRC and Andy (SomeoneElse) also maps pubs this way
True, but not with a zealous committment to it "absolutely being the
best way". I'm open to persuasion.
Part of the reason might be that I'm probably more likely to sit in
the beer garden than most people (as evidenced by the mapping trip to
Consall Forge where my suggestion that we sit outside was met with
disbelieving "are you mad?" looks from all around). Another is that
I've tended to map the entire site of other businesses - see for
example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241928696 , which is a large
site surrounded by a fence - it's very clear what's part of the car
dealership and what is not.
To take a deliberately problematic example
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374419244 - how would you map them if
you weren't going to map the whole area as the pub? How would you say
that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374419080 and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374419082 belong to the pub? That's
"deliberately problematic" because clearly a section of road there
isn't owned by the pub.
Maybe if people have got better suggestions they could show how they'd
do it by editing at
http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.87134/-3.24177 (on the
dev server, preferably after dragging the imagery to one side so that
other people can also have a go)?
Cheers,
Andy (SomeoneElse)
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
