Hi foot=no would definitely be inappropriate! It would mean not permitted.
This is basically the same as the "Mapping dangerous - but valid - routes" question that you asked in December, and the responses to that are relevant here. Best Dan 2017-03-08 11:27 GMT+00:00 Stuart Reynolds <[email protected]>: > What’s the thinking about tagging foot=no along busy dual carriageways? > Specifically I would like to remove a walk from a stretch of the A2 near > Barham in Kent where there are bus stops, but no footways along the verge > (and indeed very little in the way of verge at some points). It is > technically legal to walk along the A2 from the junction to the south, but > it is most certainly not advisable and you would be taking your life into > your hands if you did so. > > BTW, access to the northbound bus stop is via a footpath through the woods. > Technically the southbound one is accessed via a footpath across a break in > the crash barriers - but we don’t have that on OSM, and I’m not about to add > it in. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26237116#map=18/51.21188/1.16626 > > Regards, > Stuart Reynolds > for traveline south east & anglia > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
