Hmm. Had forgotten that I had asked that.
Regards, Stuart Reynolds for traveline south east & anglia On 8 Mar 2017, at 11:34, Dan S <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi foot=no would definitely be inappropriate! It would mean not permitted. This is basically the same as the "Mapping dangerous - but valid - routes" question that you asked in December, and the responses to that are relevant here. Best Dan 2017-03-08 11:27 GMT+00:00 Stuart Reynolds <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: What’s the thinking about tagging foot=no along busy dual carriageways? Specifically I would like to remove a walk from a stretch of the A2 near Barham in Kent where there are bus stops, but no footways along the verge (and indeed very little in the way of verge at some points). It is technically legal to walk along the A2 from the junction to the south, but it is most certainly not advisable and you would be taking your life into your hands if you did so. BTW, access to the northbound bus stop is via a footpath through the woods. Technically the southbound one is accessed via a footpath across a break in the crash barriers - but we don’t have that on OSM, and I’m not about to add it in. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26237116#map=18/51.21188/1.16626 Regards, Stuart Reynolds for traveline south east & anglia _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
