Thirded. Examples abound but an egregious one, in this context, is the south side of Leeds City Centre where you have the Holbeck Viaduct with its 92 brick arches 3 stories high marching across the urban landscape. An extremely visible structure in reality but rendered invisible on all the main layers simply due to *disused=yes*.
Regards, *Paul* On 2 November 2017 at 13:37, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk> wrote: > > > On 2 November 2017 13:23:53 GMT+00:00, ael <law_ence....@ntlworld.com> > wrote: > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +0000, Dave F wrote: > >> > > >> > o Another is railways - I'm guessing you'd want to remove the > >rendering > >> > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones, > > > >But please render existing bridges: these are quite common in Cornwall > >and are highly significant particulary where they cross roads. > >Just because the railway is dismantled or abandoned does not mean the > >bridges have magically evaporated. > > > +1 > > The embankments, cuttings and trackbed have not evaporated either. Their > presence on the map is useful for rural navigation (ROW still climb disused > embankments and cutting), and they are potential routes for ROW improvement > projects which start by staring at a map so let's make OSM useful for this > purpose. > > With 2026 looming we need to avoid hiding useful countryside information. > > Phil (trigpoint) > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
