Great. No problem here with commercial suppliers rehosting osm data as long as there's clear attribution and licensing, which there is. This could be useful for many "read-only" users and potentially relieve some load on the main osm tileserver since it could fulfil various of their needs.
For my taste, they should probably be clearer in the naming. Instead of name it as "OpenStreetMap", it would be better to say this is "OpenStreetMap carto vector rendering", or something less clunky but not just osm. Else there's a risk of some users believing that what they get there is the only form in which osm data can be expressed. Best Dan 2018-07-10 20:16 GMT+01:00 Jez Nicholson <jez.nichol...@gmail.com>: > https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=fae788aa91e54244b161b59725dcbb2a > > "...updated every few weeks..." is not so great > > "...freely available for any user or developer..." sounds good > > discuss.... > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb > _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
