On Monday, 11 March 2019, Warin wrote: > On 11/03/19 10:45, Martin Wynne wrote: > >> There's clearly no evidence of 4 wheeled vehicles, so it should be > >> marked as a bridleway, but It's advisable to check the whole length > >> as sections can be used by vehicles such as agricultural ones to get > >> between adjacent fields. > > > > It's a public bridleway, with the usual "evidence", so no argument > > about that. > > > > But is it highway=bridleway or highway=track? > > > > There is evidence of recent wheeled use, which I think was a tractor > > gaining access across the adjacent fields for the purpose of > > hedge-trimming alongside it. It clearly was once a vehicular track. > > > > What I think I'm getting at is this -- is the highway= tag intended to > > represent the physical appearance, or the intended use? > > Arr .. > I'd tag the present use. > > highway=track > motor_vehicle=private? > horse=yes > surface=unpaved > > Where the 'wheeled use' is not evident then I'd tag highway=bridleway etc > Access tags for a bridleway in the UK or in my experience England and Wales should be horse=designated, foot=designated and bicycle=designated. As Andy mentioned the important tag is designation=public_bridleway.
Phil (trigpoint) -- Sent from my Sailfish device _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
