Ah, good spot. The "type=*" tag on a relation is usually used to indicate what sort of relationship is represented, e.g. type=multipolygon. The latter might in fact be a reasonable thing to do here?
Best Dan Op di 3 sep. 2019 om 16:06 schreef Michael Booth <boot...@gmail.com>: > > Tagging it as type=memorial and memorial=yes doesn't seem very useful to me. > > Even though the wiki doesn't say you can use historic=memorial on a > relation, I would tag it as that. It would be similar to this one nearby > [1], would still get rendered and be recognised by data consumers. Or > failing that, just add it as a node. > > [1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7838824 > > On 03/09/2019 11:40, Andy Mabbett wrote: > > I've just added the RNLI Dunkirk Memorial at Margate to the map: > > > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9995162 > > > > but I wasn't sure how to best tag the relation, and the three > > connected ways that comprise it. > > > > It's an area of white-painted conrete, in the shape of an anchor. > > > > Any suggestions for improvement? > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
