On 4/9/19 9:16 am, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote:
The Uffington White Horse is tagged as man_made=geoglyph, which seems
apposite and is documented (if underused).
+1. Not all on hills, small .. or historic
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marree_Man
Adding a natural=bare_rock tag to reflect the exposed bedrock
underneath (yes, chalk is a rock) would seem acceptable, and would
have the definite bonus of getting the shape to render.
Otherwise, a hill figure can be variously a tourist attraction, a
memorial, a monument, an archaeological site - it would depend on the
specifics of when, by whom and for what purpose it was initially
constructed.
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 23:53 Andy Mabbett, <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 15:01, Jez Nicholson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Not sure that there is proper consensus on how to map
> drawn things, like the Cerne Abbas Giant
I've started a discussion, specifically about hill figures, on the
tagging list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-September/047860.html
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
