> as I understand it Sustrans near Derby changed their mapping to match what was in OSM
So that is now in their GIS and so on OS and so OS needs to acknowledge OSM at osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ncn? On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 at 18:29, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/11/2019 18:19, Edward Bainton wrote: > > (much snippage) > > Sustrans appear to have moved the NCN routes off their own site altogether > (perhaps not news to you), and link directly to > osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ncn. The behaviour is pretty horrible - eg, > can't cope with more than one NCN/LCN route on a given stretch of road, > which the OpenCycleMap layer does very nicely. OTOH there's a link to a > route description and to buy the Sustrans paper map. I've no experience of > these. > > Just to throw in a local anecdote as an aside, as I understand it Sustrans > near Derby changed their mapping to match what was in OSM because (a) what > we had was a better representation of the signage on the ground and (b) it > was a better route for cyclists! > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
