Could make them all fast food outlets? Bakewell tarts, Melton Mowbray pies, 
Cornish Pasties, and my favourite Cartmel sticky toffee puddings……

Chocolate might just be a cuisine?

 

Or is that just stirring the pot J

 

Cheers

Andy

 

From: SK53 [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 08 November 2019 11:54
To: Peter Neale
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Name Suggestion Index

 

I wish there was a general rule which could be easily formulated: certainly it 
would be useful to make some useful rules-of-thumb more explicit. Below is a 
crude attempt at some considerations.

 

Broadly speaking the shop=confectionery, confectionery=chocolate is probably 
what works best. The issue is not specifically chocolate but, as DaveF pointed 
out earlier in the thread, all the other specialist sweet/cake shops selling 
local specialties such as fudge or toffee (or perhaps even Bakewell Puddings). 
There are probably lots of these special cases which is usually a good sign to 
stick with the more general tag. The other issue is that a tag has to work 
across the globe & the presence of significant numbers of South Asian sweet 
outlets in Britain also suggests sticking with the more general tag. 

 

Also confectionery is more widely used & has a much longer usage. So both sets 
of tags need to be looked at anyway if one is looking for chocolate shops. 

 

Lastly using a subtag (confectionery) always means one is adding information 
and not changing the meaning of an existing tag. shop=chocolate implies that 
shop=confectionery is a shop which sells sweet things except chocolate.

 

The archetypal shop tag where a more general value is better than a specific 
one is shop=beauty. Some will be pure nail bars, but many offer a bewildering 
array of treatments. The general tag allows one not to have to worry about all 
this detail unless one is specifically interested. 

 

For really posh chocolate shops (not Hotel Chocolat or Thorntons) one could add 
craft=chocolatier (but be careful, many years ago I remember being disappointed 
to discover that the Belgiian chocolate firm Godiva was owned by Campbells 
Soup).

 

Jerry

 

On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 at 11:01, Peter Neale via Talk-GB 
<[email protected]> wrote:

Hotel Chocolat could be tagged "shop=chocolate", I suppose, but chocolate is a 
sub-set of confectionery, so perhaps it should retain "shop=confectionery", so 
that users looking for a sugar high don't have to search for both 
shop=confectionery and shop=chocolate (and shop=boiled sweets and 
shop=fruit_gums and shop=seaside_rock and....)?

 

Would that make it "shop=confectionery / confectionery=chocolate"?  (I am a bit 
new to the "rules" of tagging) 

 

Regards,

Peter

 

 

On Friday, 8 November 2019, 10:41:28 GMT, Silent Spike 
<[email protected]> wrote: 

 

 

I'm a (UK based) maintainer of the NSI repository and can push changes directly 
to it. I haven't been as active lately, but previously was working my way 
through UK brands.

 

"The Range" is one I've looked at previously but never figured out the most 
appropriate tagging which is why it still isn't in the index (for cases like 
that I'd like to consult the community for some consensus). I'll actually start 
a new thread to discuss this brand today.

 

"Hotel Chocolat" I believe is shop=confectionery in the index purely because it 
was the established tagging. If there is some community consensus it should be 
changed then that can be done (and this is why the index is so useful, because 
all existing locations matched to the brand via `brand:wikidata` could be 
automatically re-tagged with the preferred value).

 

If there are brands missing or issues with the current brand tagging I'd 
suggest either:

- Open an issue on the repository (or a pull request if you're comfortable with 
git and json) and all contributors will then see it

- If you don't have a github account and don't want one, just bring things up 
on this mailing list (feel free to email me directly too) and I'll see them and 
can either open an issue or push changes

 

 

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Reply via email to