28 Nov 2019, 11:30 by [email protected]: > As Jerry says, the key feature was that it compared OS road names to OSM and > highlighted the differences. > Just to check: was it containing any third-party data where "the licence explicitly excludes rights in third party data and therefore you need to take the same steps as you would for CC0 licenced material. " would cause it to become unsuitable for OSM use? See https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility#Open_Government_Licence_.28OGL.29_based_licences > The Microsoft Open Data Team recently analysed > streets-with-no-name-but-lots-of-houses which threw up positive hits, and > some potentially false positives of new housing estates which do not have > road names yet and auxiliary service roads. > StreetComplete would suffer from the same issue, though there is some benefit from tagging noname=yes > I'd like to see a new tool be built.... > Sounds like something doable, but for me it goes onto a big pile of "nice idea, not enough free time" for now. Also, licence issue would need to be confirmed to be not existing (has somebody did a review who makes this data? Is there even any third party data there?) > i'd also like someone to fund it being built and sustain it either through a > grant or donated work. >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
