On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 20:24, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 14:13, nathan case <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for your input Robert, the approach taken for routes not following > > the definitive line makes sense - though does this lead to two paths being > > rendered? Or does highway=no prevent this? I will also add the fixme as > > Tony suggests. > > I'd be surprised if any map renders this as a highway.
I've seen maps from a multi-billion-dollar-revenue organisation that were rendering anything with a highway tag the same as their most minor road style. So I think it was a case of rendering highway=* as a small road, and then adding additional rules for specific highway values to show them as larger roads. Very few people would make this mistake since it's a pretty obvious problem that will show up quickly, but I do wonder how many people use a specific list of road values and then draw everything else as paths. In that case, there's a risk of highway=no showing up as a path. Thanks, Andy _______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
