Lester makes a very valid point - the UPRNs relating to roads/streets
are probably not adopted (certainly the example that I cited in Fife is
not adopted)
On 13/08/2020 11:21, Lester Caine wrote:
On 13/08/2020 10:55, SK53 wrote:
That was me too, I would have added the USRN if I'd had it
immediately accessible. My understanding is that UPRNs do apply to
roads, but have much to learn about them. I've added them to a couple
of others at Cinderhill which is housing built on open fields so no
historical properties there.
This is a case of establishing what the UPRN actually relates to in
terms of the parcel of land covered by it. There WILL be a UPRN for
either the parcel of land, or even for the individual fields, but
those will be superseded by the new UPRN's for each of the subdivided
parcels in the new development. It is MY take on things that
publically adopted roads only have a USRN and the historic UPRN is
simply that - an historic record. But I believe ( and stand to be
corrected ) that private roads do require a UPRN covering the
ownership of the land? The UPRN is in essence the reference to the
land registration showing ownership, and it may be today that councils
are registering the publically adopted roads as has been seen recently
with their claiming ownership of land people thought was part of their
gardens but which the council want to sell them ... even where land
registry records show a different situation?
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
