That sounds like the way forward. Phil (trigpoint)
On 21 June 2025 20:42:31 BST, Daniel Hatton via Talk-GB <[email protected]> wrote: >On 21/06/2025 18:10, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote: > >> In your example I presume you mean the stream, but that looks to be more >> inaccurately & coarsely mapped than the admin boundary. > >OK, proposal: why don't I start by tweaking the relevant watercourses to >follow their paths from the OS OpenMap Local layer on iD (with the standard >attribution tag for that source, of course)? I'm presuming that layer is >specified on the same grid as the OS Boundary-Line data and therefore doesn't >need any alignment before tracing from it. > >(By "the relevant watercourses", I mean ways #5544801, #93133917, and >#85357655. Their current courses were plotted by OSM users smb001, comsomol, >and Kevin Steinhardt - are any of you on here and want to object or assent?) > >-- > >Kind regards, > >Dan Hatton > > Dr. Daniel C. Hatton > >E-mail: [email protected] > >Signal: dch.28 >SIP: [email protected] > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
