In the first instance I would change this to hazard:description=*. Presumably the hazard itself is hazard=train(s) which is rather self-explanatory and pretty much implicit for level crossings. There are a total of 26 train on taginfo.openstreetmap.org, with a couple of hazard=trains.
Finding an appropriate tag for those Network Rail consider particularly significant would also be useful. It's several years since Paul Sladen asked me to collect some information about a couple of pedestrian level crossings in Beeston which had a high rate of fatalities. I've only revisted one since 2020 and that now has traffic signals. Jerry PS Incidentally, hazard=school_zone which is a popular value seems misplaced to me. On Sun, 9 Nov 2025 at 09:04, Daniel Hatton via Talk-GB < [email protected]> wrote: > > I've been thinking for a while that there should be some sort of hazard > warning on the level crossing represented by nodes #20590608 and > #2187758447. For now, I've added the following tag to both nodes: > > hazard="Network Rail risk-assesses this level crossing as risk rating > C2, i.e. very high risk both to individual users and to the community as > a whole" > > but I don't think that's quite proper use of the hazard tag. > Suggestions, please? > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-GB mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
