Good point, something I hadn't considered On 10 Aug 2015 15:37, "Rory McCann" <[email protected]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/08/15 00:13, Dave Corley wrote: > > - In terms of representation, when it comes to looking for data > > from govt. bodies, again I would keep it simple. For formal (in > > person, snail mail) representations, if the body is based in NI, it > > falls to OSM Ireland, if the body is based elsewhere it falls to > > OSM UK. > > I don't know about this. I'd suggest allowing either group to be able > to make formal representations. Who knows, maybe some governmental > body might be more receptive to something from one group or the other? > Both groups can and should discuss together before making any formal > requests. We both want the same thing, and it would suck if we tied > ourselves down to one method that will bite us later. Why not keep our > options open? > > Rory > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVyLb7AAoJEOrWdmeZivv27IMH+gKyx0pdP2GY/g13bqcn5dgQ > eNUbmVt8/ggVhfn0Wy1VuMIUkM0RyRGdJlhEdMoGw5PtRnFsLeM44hDFfTJ/u1DO > B8d19bbgzEvjkMtBmhqeaEn4KScOwCXyWhv2u0OS/AVApYr1EXotN0vSLqOvsDPw > NRWTFTln3k1u//Po9v9T2S/ucwOTVmo0UaL8GO3Mwfe5K3pcFdBiTsseFNOzzcRV > 0gGFCF+G5Ftmtoa0hq9d/yIpbbHiayKpJKk1iaA3TDK3QPhlGi6g2VKvZqUVLJjN > 2sWWa9d/zhw041m+0tGdSDhPuYEuK4y5i4DN5Df+iwGizh/+kHP3IufELgqcKYI= > =xcpq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ie mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie > _______________________________________________ Talk-ie mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
