Hi Mark,
Thanks for your feedback, I have made most of the changes that I mentioned
in my email but I didn't split any townlands (yet). It's a good point that
I don't need to split a townland border just because a parish or barony
border runs through it. As long as I assume that townlands do not add up to
parishes, then townlands can overlap two different parishes. (i.e. we can
run a parish border through the middle or a townland). I suppose this is ok
then. The townland "Lugaphuill" then is just oddly shaped as you say.

Can someone confirm that townlands do not necessarily add up to civil
parishes?

Well if we don't split townlands: Below is an example of where
"Druminracahill" townland IS split in two parts in OSM due to a civil
parish boundary. So should this very small split townland part be merged
with it's big brother?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/799934#map=18/53.83127/-9.26316&layers=N

All all best,
Brian


On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Mark Tully <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> My own opinion would be that townlands shouldn't be split in OSM and if
> they overlap parishes, then it's up to the software using the OSM data to
> figure out how to handle them.
>
> As far as I understand it, townlands don't necessarily add up to civil
> parishes, civil parishes don't necessarily add up to baronies and baronies
> don't necessarily add up to counties.  Furthermore, townlands don't
> necessarily add up to electoral divisions.  In rural areas, the GSGS3906
> map splits the townland into 2 pieces (e.g. Agall (ED Derrycoooly) and
> Agall (ED Screggan) at
> http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=16&lat=53.26048&lon=-7.
> 59323&layers=B00TFFFFFFFFFFFF,
> but in urban areas, it doesn't, it just cuts the ED (and town) boundary
> through the townland e.g.
> http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=15&lat=52.80303&lon=-6.
> 73163&layers=B00TFFFFFFFFFFFF.
> Make of that what you will!
>
> Regarding some of your specific issues:
> 3: I've come across several areas with CPs covering 2 non adjoining areas
> so this doesn't look that unusual e.g.:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4280429
> 4: I think it's just awkwardly shaped.  Not sure if there's a boundary at
> the narrow part or not on
> http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/?zoom=16&lat=53.8103&lon=-9.
> 2563&layers=B00TFFFFFFFFFFFF,
> but I don't see the name for the second townland on the GSGS3906 map if it
> is.
>
> Bear in mind that this is all just my own opinion and others may disagree.
>
> Hope this helps,
> Mark
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 22:05 Brian Tuffy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I'm fairly new to OSM, I map under the username OscarBrownbread.
> > I have been mapping Castlebar and Co. Mayo. Recently I have been looking
> > more at townlands!!!!
> >
> > I have found many spelling errors in townland names (approx 10) in my
> > locality. Cross referencing them with the loganim data helped correct
> them.
> > Anyway, I now see many other challenges, I see many townlands that look
> > like they should be split. This is usually because of civil parishes
> (CPs)
> > or baronies going through them.
> >
> > Here are some of the issues I have come across in my area.
> > (0) townland spelling mistakes due to hard-to-read or missing letters in
> > the Brittish War Maps source
> > (1) Civil parish "Balla" missing
> > (2) CP "Mayo" is split into two parts, "Mayo (clanmorris portion)" and
> > "Mayo (kilmaine portion)" due to different baronies
> > (3) townland "Brownhall Demense" belonging to CP "Mayo" disconnected from
> > the rest of the CP (disconnected by the CP Balla which we still need to
> add
> > to OSM). This forms two closed ways in the boundary relation instead of
> > one.
> > (4) townland "Lugaphuill" really looks like it should be split in two
> > separate townlands with the same name that border eachother, but it is
> > currently one big townland in OSM. Now the name label (centroid) is in
> > another townland.
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/53.8103/-9.2563&layers=N
> >
> > Ok, So I am Not looking for advice on how to solve each issue, that I can
> > try myself as I go forward. If you are curious, you can check out my OSM
> > map notes here.
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/799945#map=13/53.7623/-9.1082&layers=N
> .
> > But, I do need to know how to split townlands,
> >
> > My question is, Should we split townlands to make parish/barony borders
> > more accurate?
> > This results in townlands with the exact same name bordering eachother.
> > Wouldn't this result in confusion for search engines, programming
> database
> > etc. ?? Is it even possible to handle this?
> > If we do split them (as it is shown on the more recent maps), should we
> > name them differently? e.g. ballytown #1, ballytown #2 ?
> > Possibly, name= ballytown, name_official=ballytown#1 or something like
> > that?
> > I suppose we should rename but Townland names from the maps already
> contain
> > "north" "south" "east" "upper" "lower" etc. (BTW, anyone know why "upper"
> > is always to the south??)
> >
> > Whatever we do, I don't think we should do anything logical or sensible,
> > that would not be in the spirit of mapping townlands ha ha ;p
> > (Jasus... I just came across "Buncam North" and below it, "Buncam
> East"....
> > where the hell is Buncam south?? ....Ahhh  ok.)
> >
> > If I understand correctly:
> > (a) Townlands add up to parishes (so they should not overlap eachother),
> > yes or no?
> > (b) parishes and baronies are independent and can overlap eachother. yes
> or
> > no?
> >
> > Thanks for those who have read my rant this far, I hope this can help new
> > mappers.
> > I understand that electorial districts (EDs) are more official but I
> hope I
> > can better understand how to proceed with splitting townlands and naming
> > townlands.
> >
> > Finally, I love our old townlands and I only want to help make them
> > accurate and available for all. Down with Eircodes, up with Townlands!!
> he
> > he
> >
> > All the best,
> > Brian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-ie mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ie mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ie mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Reply via email to