Hi,

Over time, Stabilo_boss, others and I have added a fair bit of detail to 
Balbriggan, such that the map there is generally in a better condition than the 
surrounding towns, the big difference being that the the other towns generally 
have a higher percentage (but still low) of individual houses mapped than 
Balbriggan. As a mapping exercise, Balbriggan would therefore be of less use 
than the other towns. There will of course be extendable data.


That said, from a town planning point of view, Balbriggan is probably more 
interesting than the other towns.


I wouldn't overly worry about third-party mappers interfering.


Features that could be added by the students:

* Individual houses and other buildings (landmark buildings fairly well mapped).
* Retail and other service businesses;
* Non-roadway street features, including paths and street furniture;
* Confirm street names (there's the usual fuzziness with unsigned legacy roads);
* Addresses;
* Bus routes
* Update construction;
* Rural features;
* Local road numbers, if available.

If the students are to be assessed on their work, then each should be given two 
tasks (a) surveying, recording and mapping everything in one neighbourhood to 
get experience at mapping different keys / tags and (b) doing the same for one 
type of key / tag over a wider area to understand differences between areas.


Colm


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the 
world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead
_______________________________________________
Talk-ie mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Reply via email to