May 15, 2020, 00:04 by [email protected]:

> The fact that so many buildings are being mapped as building=yes when more
> accurate tagging is plainly obvious makes this an utterly frustrating
> project.
>
> Saying that others can come along after and correct it is a totally
> avoidable requirement by using more appropriate tagging in the first place.
> Its also unlike to ever get corrected as evidenced by the volume of data in
> Ireland that was created and never improved upon.
>
If there is not enough mappers then likely mapping more building as building=yes
is more efficient than using specific building value anyway.

And anyone may map whatever (s)he wants, it is perfectly fine to 
map roads without mapping buildings, map trees instead of mapping roads,
map buildings as building=yes, map bicycle parkings and map no shops at all...

Note also that for example StreetComplete allows newbies and beginners to
build on build on initial not finished data and for example specify 
more exact building types.

> The logical approach should be to map it as house/garage/shed etc and ONLY
> use building=yes if you cannot make an educated guess.
>
> Doing otherwise puts this data on the level of the tiger import.
>
No. TIGER import had plenty of outright invalid, incorrect and insane data.
This is merely missing not very important part of info.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:TIGER_fixup_example_before.jpg
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Braided-streets-example.jpg
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup

_______________________________________________
Talk-ie mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Reply via email to