This is looking good to me. It would be great to have a diary post on tools/workflow to do this. Have always found handling and modifying these relations painful.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have set up NH765 as a prototype for the reformed relations - NH765 is a > small route where it should be easy to fine tune the idea before full-scale > conversion. > > The base route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3871741) would > only contain sub-relations with for each State that it passes through with > appropriate role names (as the E-route system already does). > > The sub-relations, for Telangana ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5826946) and Andhra Pradesh ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5826980) in our case, would > contain appropriately ordered ways, with the main route on top and links > (slip roads) at the bottom. > > I envisage that one relation for each state should be sufficient for the > time being. > > — Amaroussi. > _______________________________________________ > Talk-in mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in > -- Arun Ganesh @planemad <http://j.mp/ArunGanesh>
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
