I see the missing AL6 in India has been replaced by me a week or so ago according to its history. The replacement is relation 6532860. Though I cannot remember why I did it, whether I removed the previous one or found it missing.
On 6 September 2016 at 08:20, Walter Nordmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, admin_boundaries should be relations (multipolygons) with this tags: > > type=boundary, boundary=administrative, admin_level=XX, name=YY. > > area=yes is not needed, because boundaries are always closed (or should be > ;)) and are describing an area. > > Just to be shure i checked Velur Ward IV https://openstreetmap.org/rela > tion/6526524 and it's looking fine. BUT there are remains of the old > boundary ways, which should be removed from OSM. > > See https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/images/osm/snaps_2016/Velur_Ward_IV.png > which shows a Josm view of that area. > Pink: new relation, red: old redundant ways, which should be removed. > > Regards > walter/germany > > btw: I'm doing a lot of stuff with boundaries. > > see https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundaries for QA and exporting > boundaries > and https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/projekte/internatio > nale-administrative-grenzen/missing-boundaries > > detail: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/projekte/internatio > nale-administrative-grenzen/missing-boundaries/10-osm- > reports/667-countries-compare-2016-08-28 > One AL6 in India has been deleted. It's just "gone", but we don't know why. > > there will be a report every day. current day is still running. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-in mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in >
_______________________________________________ Talk-in mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
