As tutubu said, this ruling will definitely appealed all the way to the Supreme Court. So I guess we should wait for it.
As for the actual tagging, I prefer tagging the actual situation on the ground. That is, which city's signs you can see on the affected areas. On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, tutubi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ian, > > it's not yet over. the SC's decision may flip-flop again :P > > hmm...which barangay is Kalayaan avenue located? My concern is mostly on the > number coding. > Kalayaan avenue from EDSA up to BGC is Makati where there's no number coding > window. > Taguig has no number coding except EDSA and C5. > > I think I need to update my personal map of number-coding free roads :P > > IIRC, there's also a request or case of pateros to re-acquire lost > territories from makati, some of those > given to Taguig but that's another story > > lastly, residents of those affected barangays like students of UMak may have > to pay tuition, the sick have to look for another hospital besides > OsMak. Senior citizens will miss free movie screenings and birthday cakes > from Binay > > ;P > > > > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:52 AM, ianlopez <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> http://www.philstar.com/nation/article.aspx?publicationSubCategoryId=65&articleId=768709 >> >> Question: should we modify the administrative boundaries or wait for >> Makati's reaction/next move? _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
