Going back to this discussion and because it was raised again during a F2F meeting last Saturday [0]. I corrected a a lot of duplicates. First, I extracted all version1 node contribution of username:ivet that has a key osm_id using overpass:
<query type="node"> <user name="ivet"/> <has-kv k="osm_id"/> </query> <print mode="meta"/> My assumption for extracting this data is that they are existing OSM POIs which were planned to be polygonized but was accidentally uploaded. In my random, eye-balling. I did see many of these duplicates (2-3 times). I completely deleted these duplicated using JOSM validation [1] Please have a look and let me know if I made it worse. [0] https://plus.google.com/106331524452439989301/posts/2c8UU1x1mLn?pid=6165066674616492242&oid=109394390468066203655&authkey=CMCq7fX9offhjgE [1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32281314 On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Erwin Olario <[email protected]> wrote: > Great suggestion from Eugene to merge nodes into polygons. FWIW, in the JOSM > editor, the shortcut key to merge nodes is "M". > > Erwin Olario > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > » email: [email protected] | [email protected] > » mobile: (PHL): +63 908 817 2013 > » OpenPGP key: 3A93D56B | 5D42 7CCB 8827 9046 1ACB 0B94 63A4 81CE 3A93 D56B > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Feye, >> >> This is OK. Was just curious about the similar activity and wanted to know >> what was happening. :-) >> >> Anyway, I do have a suggestion. Instead of deleting the original POI node, >> please suggest that they use the original node as one of the nodes of the >> new polygon. This is so that the original person that added the POI node is >> still "credited" somehow in the existing objects in the database. >> >> I have left that suggestion on a few of their changesets, but it seems >> they have not read it. :( >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859930 >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26859253 >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26858714 >> >> ~Eugene >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Feye Andal <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Sir, >>> >>> We from Project NOAH are polygonizing point POIs so that we can use it >>> for the WebSAFE feature of Project NOAH. WebSAFE (web version of InaSAFE) >>> only uses polygons as its exposure data to be able to function correctly. >>> Sir Maning instructed me to delete the points after we polygonize them. >>> >>> We apologize for not informing you right away. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Feye >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Does anybody have any idea what these mappers are doing doing changesets >>>> that only say "adding attribute"? >>>> >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aileen_aviera/history >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Khym/history >>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ivet/history >>>> >>>> Most of these changesets seem to be polygonizing point POIs. >>>> >>>> ~Eugene >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> talk-ph mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> talk-ph mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >> > > > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ http://twitter.com/maningsambale ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
