From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dquarter "This does not have to be an administrative entity. "
We agreed in the past that barangay is synonymous to place=village. Were there any changes with this view? On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jherome Miguel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am already seeing retagging of barangays in urban areas (e.g. Metro Manila) > from place=village to place=quarter. Our present guidelines for tagging local > government unit (LGU) says barangays always get tagged as village regardless > if it's in an urban or rural area, but the recommendation to tag urban > barangays to quarter hasn't been documented yet nor discussed (though I agree > with it as they better reflect the situation in urban areas and the general > tagging recommendations). > > Our current guidelines on mapping sitios/puroks is to tag them as > place=neighbourhood, even if it's on a rural or isolated area. I tag them as > place=hamlet instead, as they better reflect how they are in reality (those > are usually clusters of homes with populations of ~100-200, though those are > just approximates as they are not covered in censuses) and best follows > general tagging recommendations. I'm also considering having this scheme for > sitios/puroks depending on their location: > > * Urban - place=neighbourhood > * Rural - place=hamlet > _______________________________________________ > talk-ph mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://github.com/maning http://twitter.com/maningsambale ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
