Pardon for my confusion, but I don's see the value of splitting barangays to village and quarter in the context of the Philippines.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:19 PM Jherome Miguel <[email protected]> wrote: > > I also thought of using the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) > subclassifications of barangays to determine which gets quarter or village, > as being inside a city boundary doesn't make every barangay urban. > > * urban barangay - quarter > * rural barangay - village > > We may also consider having a tag to handle the PSA subclassification. > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 8:03 PM Jherome Miguel <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Eugene suggested to tag barangays in cities as place=quarter when >> applicable. We already agree to tag remote or rural sitios/puroks as >> place=hamlet, and we haven't agreed on how to deal with urban barangays. >> >> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:56 PM maning sambale <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dquarter >>> "This does not have to be an administrative entity. " >>> >>> We agreed in the past that barangay is synonymous to place=village. >>> Were there any changes with this view? >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 8:57 AM Jherome Miguel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > I am already seeing retagging of barangays in urban areas (e.g. Metro >>> > Manila) from place=village to place=quarter. Our present guidelines for >>> > tagging local government unit (LGU) says barangays always get tagged as >>> > village regardless if it's in an urban or rural area, but the >>> > recommendation to tag urban barangays to quarter hasn't been documented >>> > yet nor discussed (though I agree with it as they better reflect the >>> > situation in urban areas and the general tagging recommendations). >>> > >>> > Our current guidelines on mapping sitios/puroks is to tag them as >>> > place=neighbourhood, even if it's on a rural or isolated area. I tag them >>> > as place=hamlet instead, as they better reflect how they are in reality >>> > (those are usually clusters of homes with populations of ~100-200, though >>> > those are just approximates as they are not covered in censuses) and best >>> > follows general tagging recommendations. I'm also considering having this >>> > scheme for sitios/puroks depending on their location: >>> > >>> > * Urban - place=neighbourhood >>> > * Rural - place=hamlet >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > talk-ph mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> cheers, >>> maning >>> ------------------------------------------------------ >>> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >>> https://github.com/maning >>> http://twitter.com/maningsambale >>> ------------------------------------------------------ -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden https://github.com/maning http://twitter.com/maningsambale ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ talk-ph mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
