> > > > I've had an initial look . We seem to have a pretty big problem in > alignment > > in the City Centre (probably because of our estimations arising from crap > > GPS traces)- so I've not done any editing/merging until we agree an > > approach. > > Yeah, I was looking at the city centre a little before the import, > wasnt sure who to blame. (Google maps also use naptan data, so if you > compare the points with the aerial view, you can see they're a bit > off) - We still need a good way of aligning them though without > referring to them. > > > Lots of the other data hasn't imported completely yet (lots of > > naptan nodes but no data tagged) so I'll wait and take another look. > > All data was uploaded as of about 10pm last night. If you find any > elements that look like glitches in the conversion, please report them > to me.
*Looks OK now* > > > > We also need to agree on the verified/unverified tag - do we delete or > change > > the yes/no value? > > The idea was to delete it. *I agree unverified:no is just plain > counter-intertuitive* > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
