Brian Prangle [mailto:[email protected]] wrote: >Sent: 31 March 2009 9:34 AM >To: Thomas Wood >Cc: Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists); [email protected]; Talk- >[email protected] >Subject: Re: [Talk-transit] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NaPTAN import starts - >Birmingham trial area first > > > > I've had an initial look . We seem to have a pretty big problem in >alignment > > in the City Centre (probably because of our estimations arising >from crap > > GPS traces)- so I've not done any editing/merging until we agree an > > approach. > > > Yeah, I was looking at the city centre a little before the import, > wasnt sure who to blame. (Google maps also use naptan data, so if you > compare the points with the aerial view, you can see they're a bit > off) - We still need a good way of aligning them though without > referring to them. > > > > Lots of the other data hasn't imported completely yet (lots of > > naptan nodes but no data tagged) so I'll wait and take another >look. > > > All data was uploaded as of about 10pm last night. If you find any > elements that look like glitches in the conversion, please report >them > to me. > >Looks OK now > > > > > > We also need to agree on the verified/unverified tag - do we delete >or change > > the yes/no value? > > > The idea was to delete it. I agree unverified:no is just plain >counter-intertuitive >
I've been deleting where I already have a stop in the db and have merged the data to the naptan node. Where my nodes are some way off the naptan nodes I'm leaving them alone until a resurvey check. Cheers Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
