Perhaps another way of getting a high-level view on the number of tracks on a route is to create infrastructure relations for (long) sections of route that have tracks=X on them, but can include some bits with tracks drawn separately, and some with a single way.
The renderer can then choose to render the information from the relation rather than the way at lower zooms. This would be much more in line with existing practice than trying to create transverse relations. Richard On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Cartinus <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 26 June 2009 10:27:07 Peter Miller wrote: > > However I am participating in this thread because I want to be able to > > produce rail maps that use different line styles for single track, > > twin track and multi-track routes because single track working is a > > real pain for operators and it is important to be able to see where > > they are on a map. Typically single track sections will be in one > > colour, twin track in another and multi-track in another one. > > You can actually do that with the tag proposed in the mail that started > this > thread. You don't need anything more complex. > > -- > m.v.g., > Cartinus > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-transit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit >
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
