Hi all, On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Peter Miller <[email protected]>wrote:
> I think the problem is that we are using the term Route for at least two > different things. > The more I think about it, the more I think this needs resolving (and well documenting)! The first question is what does route=railway denote, the infrastructure or the service pattern? To put it in concrete terms, there are two regular Eurostar services, London-Paris and London-Brussels. Should there be a railway=route relation for each of these services? What about the ocassional Disneyland and "snow train" services to the Alps? These services also travel along the lines known as "High Speed 1" (from Folkestone to London) and "the Channel Tunnel" - should these also be tagged as separate relations? Frankie -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
