2009/9/10 Peter Miller <[email protected]>
> Let's use Waterloo as a test case for OSM. Bank/Monument would also be > useful because it is given as an example in the NaPTAN documentation. Lets > also focus on the stations given in the IFOPT documentation examples. > Incidentally Waterloo is used as an example thoughout the IFOPT > documentation. > Okay, so I've just added two new relations for Waterloo (so now it has 5): * railway station = http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/238792 * tube station = http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/238793 I had to add stop nodes for the tube lines (didn't seem to be any existing ones). They are all tagged as role=stop on the relation. I'm not sure what tag we should be using on the nodes themselves. Sometimes we've used railway=station (which means they all display on the renderers), sometimes we've used railway=halt (as was originally proposed in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/unified_stoparea, but I think this is wrong as railway=halt has historically been used for request stops). I've experimentally used railway=stop for Waterloo - these could be a good way of distinguishing stopping points from the 'station' nodes that are used in the simpler schema). Guess we also need to add the platforms for Waterloo (Wikipedia says there are 20), as well as some of the accesses (footbridges, etc). Frankie -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
