2009/9/10 Peter Miller <[email protected]>
> It does appear to be a little complex around Waterloo and possibly wrong? > Okay, so I've done a little 'tidying up'... There is now a single relation ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/201171) which contains all the bus stops near the station which are called 'Waterloo', or which are directly outside the station (node 277675366 seems to have been mapped by a user, rather than from the NaPTAN import, so is possibly a duplicate). The following 'local_ref' codes are included: A,B,C,F,H,J,K,N,S,V,W - indicating that there are quite a few missing (presuming they go from A to at least W without skipping any letters?) There are also 2 NaPTAN-created relations which now no longer have any members, http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/201160 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/199517 as I've moved all of these to the previous relation. The StopAreaCodes seem to be different (though only by the last letter) - so I don't know if these means that they have some administrative difference? What should we do with these relations? The train station is a separate relation ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/238792), which includes the building (as role=outline), a few shops, and now the ex-International platforms 20-25, (as ways, with stop points, alongside ways for each of the tracks). Platforms 1-19 are still to do... :-) The tube station is yet another relation ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/238793), which just contains 4 stop nodes on each of the tube line ways. I suggest that each of these 3 relations should belong to a parent 'Waterloo' relation, but I can't seem to currently do this within Potlatch. Can somebody else have a go (does JOSM support this?) Any other suggestions for improvements are welcome (particularly from people who live a bit closer...) Frankie > The stop areas you refer to have type codes which are described in the > NaPTAN schema document, but I am not clear that it is at all correct based > on a quick look I also notice that many of the areas have duplicate names > which also makes it harder to sort out. > > I believe that there is another relation in NaPTAN for the station that has > not yet been imported into NaPTAN which makes it even more complicated. > > Let's use Waterloo as a test case for OSM. Bank/Monument would also be > useful because it is given as an example in the NaPTAN documentation. Lets > also focus on the stations given in the IFOPT documentation examples. > Incidentally Waterloo is used as an example thoughout the IFOPT > documentation. > > Possibly we should have a mapping party there (I passed though it yesterday > as it happens). > > -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
