Christoph Böhme wrote: > Chris Hill <o...@raggedred.net> schrieb: > > >> It was partly because I struggled with NOVAM that I knocked up this >> overlay. I couldn't reconcile the NOVAM rules with the stops I have >> checked >> > > As Thomas already said the rules were based on the tagging scheme from > the Birmingham import. They were also devised with the idea of > implementing a web-based bus-stops merging tool. However this idea has > been dropped as it is very easy to "merge" bus stops within josm. > > I discussed a change of the colour scheme with Peter Miller a couple of > weeks ago on the West Midlands list: > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb-westmidlands/2009-September/000342.html > > At the moment I am moving to a new server and do not have time to do > any changes on NOVAM. But I plan to implement new rules in October. > > It would be interesting to know which rules you used for your overlay. > There are 5 possible outcomes:
* No highway=bus_stop, but there is a naptan:AtcoCode => naptan that is not on the ground (green bus with X over it) * highway=bus_stop and naptan:verified=no => not yet checked (red bus) * highway=bus_stop and no naptan:AtcoCode => real stop not in naptan (blue bus) * highway=bus_stop and naptan:verified != no and note=* => stop checked with a problem, such as bearing wrong (cyan bus) * highway=bus_stop and naptan:verified != no and no note => stop checked and OK (green bus) This suits the data I have and the way I want to use it, i.e. find stops to check then show others the stops that don't match their NaPTAN data for whatever reason. _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit