2009/9/28 Thomas Wood <[email protected]>
> I think the type=* tag on relations is ugly, similar to the original > class=* tag proposed on every element in the early days of OSM. > > class=* was dropped, as should type=* be. > I don't know too much about class=, but I can see an argument that type= might be redundant on relations. However, given that it is in such widespread use, I guess this is a bigger debate to have. Right now, I'm more concerned about which of these patterns is better: type=site site=railway_station or type=site railway=station The first one has the advantage of following the X=Y, Y=Z tag hierarchy convention, the second has the advantage of re-using tags that have long been adopted for nodes. Frankie -- Frankie Roberto Experience Designer, Rattle 0114 2706977 http://www.rattlecentral.com
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
