Am 06.12.2010 15:26, schrieb Andrei Klochko:
Hello,
Yes, in France it's even worse: "the database producer may forbid any
quantitatively or quantitatively substantial extraction from his
database, by all means and in any form"
BUT you have this counterpart: "when a database is made available to
the public by the holder of the rights, then he cannot forbid [among
other things] the extraction AND reuse of a quantitatively or
qualitatively non substantial part of the database, by the person who
has licit access to it".
So after all us, the "grumpy old men", were right.
I only put this line here, to ask the question: what, if many
different people, decide to all take one timetable, and then reuse it
as they want, like for example, by publishing it in a centralized site?
Then this is the wrong group. Ask a lawyer!
as these people are not part of a single company, they have no bound
with each other, they just chose to do what they are entitled to do,
i.e. reusing these timetables, in a unique web place...
Who cares whether they are bound or not?
These are two ways I explore at the moment.
You seem to know nothing of civil law, and you're elaborating about it.
That is very dangerous to yourself, and to OSM-- if you ever plan to
import anything to it. Ignorantia iuris nocet.
Here the data is made publicly available...and if the transporters are
the ultimate producers of the data, then taking it from every
transporter is only copying THEIR "database", which is not big enough
to make a database. You see?
No, I don't.
--
Best regards, mit freundlichen Grüssen, meilleurs sentiments, Pozdrowienia,
Michał Borsuk
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
