Hello
Yes, the Public Transport proposal is basically based on Oxomoa, but in
some details different.
unified stoparea would "redefine" highway=bus_stop from beside the way
to on the way. I'm quite sure this would reject the proposal in a vote.
unified stoparea and public transport can and do exist beside each
other. But you are right, it does not make sense to approve both proposals.
I do not care about which of the two proposals will be approved. But I
think it is time to get a more exact schema approved then the
fuzzy/non-existing schema (A railway station of 400m length and 20
platforms or a bus stop for 3 buses per direction of 50m length is
reduced to one node) we have now.
Regards
Teddych
On 12/08/2010 06:02 PM, Oleksandr Vlasov wrote:
Dominik Mahrer (Teddy<teddy<at> teddy.ch> writes:
I want to invite everyone to comment the (in central europe) already
widely used new Public Transport Schema:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
Hello,
it's based on Oxomoa scheme, isn't it?
What's the status of the "unified stoparea" proposal then? those two contradict
each other and unified stoparea is in RFC stage for a year now. Are there any
data regarding actual usage of those two (I understand that unified stoparea
uses quite common tags and thus it's hard to compare just a number of
appropriate tags' occurrences)
Regards,
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
