On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Michał Borsuk <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, Richard Mann wrote: >> >> I think >> the biggest uncertainty is how you handle loops at the end of a route >> - do you have overlapping single-direction relations, pick an >> abritrary position to change direction, or stick with having both >> directions in the same relation and let the data user worry about it. >> >> > > I do it this way: end points from the timetable (Kursbuch), so the "forward" > role goes to the last stop indicated in the timetable, and the "backward" > role goes forth.
I was thinking that role=loop on the loop stops might be one way to do it, with role=terminus for single-point route ends (and as a notional terminus on a loop)? This might also avoid the need for role=forward/backward on all the other stops. Richard _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
