Richard Fairhurst <richard <at> systemeD.net> writes: > It is incumbent on those making the proposal to consider how this > might be achieved. Saying "oh, the editor writers are my coding > bitches and will happily spend a weekend of their time supporting my > latest idea" is not an answer.
Sorry, your point here is not clear. You don't have obligation to implement something in the editor you (co-)wrote. You haven't had that obligation before either. > > A preset for josm is already in progress. > And Potlatch and Merkaartor? You can't just support your own favourite > editor and consider your responsibility absolved. First, I haven't heard about any responsibilities or obligations. Second, Potlatch, JOSM and Merkaator are currently different and have different features, and that does not harm. Third, there's "don't tag for the renderer" rule. I believe the idea behind that rule also implies "don't edit for the editor", i.e. it is OK to reject proposal because it is bad/unsuitable/whatever, but it's unwise to reject proposal because current implementation of the editor doesn't support that. _______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
