2011/1/22 Michał Borsuk <[email protected]> > > In urban regions it is common that a bus line has different routes for >> the both directions (often one way). >> > > This doesn't matter as OSM itself is not routing software. > > The more exact the OSM map is, the >> more likely it is that the two directions do not share the same way for >> the both directions (the lines of one street are split up). >> > > Again, this is not an argument as OSM is not a routing software, but a map. > > And as a map, we need to make the distinction between different ways, so the argument is perfectly valid. How would you draw these example maps without this notion ?
http://tisseo.fr/sites/default/files/Tisseo_hiv01web.pdf http://tisseo.fr/sites/default/files/Tisseo_hiv03web_0.pdf http://tisseo.fr/sites/default/files/Tisseo_hiv14web.pdf http://tisseo.fr/sites/default/files/Tisseo_hiv15web_0.pdf http://tisseo.fr/sites/default/files/Tisseo_hiv16web.pdf I agree we can remove the stop_area_group notion, but not this one, this is really a needed map feature, for a very common situation !
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
