2011/1/28 Richard Mann <[email protected]> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Michael von Glasow > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Following the call for a better proposal, Tiziano, Oscar and I have > drafted > > up a simple proposal. It is based on how we have mapped the public > transport > > networks in our cities (Padova, Ferrara and Milan), with some > improvements > > that came up during this discussion. > > > > Our approach was to keep it simple, therefore we have deliberately not > > treated special cases. For now, we want to standardize the basics; once > we > > have agreed on those, we can discuss special cases which might not be > > covered by the current proposal and draw up an amendment, to be decided > > separately. > > > > You can find the proposal at: > > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Simplified_Public_Transport_Scheme > > > > Constructive feedback and suggestions are welcome and can be sent to the > > list or left on the proposal's discussion page. > > Many thanks for this. > > 1) How do you envisage the mapping of loops (ie (say) six stops on > one-way loop at one end of the route). I guess the two directions > could be combined, or an arbitrary break made at some point round the > loop. I think you need to suggest either one or the other or say that > both are acceptable as long as they are ordered. >
You look at the schedule for that line and determine which one is considered the terminus by the PT company. Jo
_______________________________________________ Talk-transit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
