On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 14:30, Snusmumriken
<snusmumriken.map...@runbox.com> wrote:
>
> Somehow I think that it is too late to define one schema that would
> rule the world. Too much has already been mapped for it to be redone.
> But I might be wrong. I also share your observation that PTv2 is way
> too complex.
In my opinion, it's never too late for improvements. :) And if we go
for the first solution ("improved PTv1"), not much retagging were
required as nearly all stops, stations and platforms use the PTv1 tags
for rendering anyway.
> For what it is worth I might point you to have a look at how things are
> mapped in Stockholm metropolitan region. It is our version of a
> simplified PTv2. Unfortunately there isn't any English language
> definition of it. But I hope an example is self explanatory enough
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2376126
Thanks for the link. This routes seem to have been mapped the same way
as the first solution i've suggested.
Regards
Markus
_______________________________________________
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
