An update on our discussion about cycle tagging: the OSM cycle map
stylesheet has been updated, and it looks beautiful.
See:
http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/shine/archives/2008/08/17/hill-colouring-on-the-cycle-map/
Now you can tell the difference between streets that are part of a
cycle route tagged with lcn=yes (rendered with highlighting), those
that have designated cycle lanes tagged with cycleway=lane (rendered
with blue outlines), and those that have both. When you're zoomed
out, however, only the cycle routes are shown, not any streets that
have cycle lanes but aren't tagged with lcn.
Alan
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:57 PM, Alan McConchie wrote:
For these "class III" bike routes, I have just been tagging them
with lcn=yes and lcn_ref=## if the route has a name or number. Even
if they're not part of any cycle network, they're at least
officially condoned by the local authorities (if they've got green
bike signs) so I figure that is sufficient for the lcn tag. The lcn
tag alone will also get rendered on the OSM cycle map.
And regarding getting cycle map tiles rendered, just ask the
maintainer Andy Allan (CC'ed in this email) and he will start
rendering any area you are tagging. Check out Washington D.C. or
the major Canadian cities (Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver) for good
North American examples that are already getting rendered.
Alan
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Alan Brown wrote:
I've been working on something similar for San Jose ... I've been
working on the seperate cycle tracks, but I'll eventually get to
the roads.
Are there any server set up there rendering North American (or, at
least, Bay Area) tiles similar to the OSM cycle map?
http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/osm/
I'd also be curious - does mapnik have the ability to render
partially transparent PNGS, to use as an overlay?
----- Original Message ----
From: will law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Karl Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 5:08:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Bicycle facility tags (Class III "bike route")
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Karl Newman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Class I is the separated bike path, with a physical separation
between the bicycle path and vehicle traffic, or on a route which
other vehicle traffic doesn't follwo. This one is easy, you trace
in the path, and make it highway=cycleway; cycleway=track. It's
just the same as drawing in separate roads for divided roads.
Class II is the bike lane with its own lane markings, but it is
immediately adjacent the vehicle lanes. This also seems to be
pretty clear: just add a cycleway=lane tag to the road it is part
of, right?
Class III is a "shared use" facility with the cars, it just has the
green "bicycle route" signs occasionally. Hopefully it has a wide
outside lane, but not always. How do you put this one in? do you
add a bicycle=designated tag to the road, or what?
I have been classifying Class I & II cycleways in San Francisco
using the above method. I haven't got on to the Class III type but
bicycle=designated seems appropriate to me.
I think your suggestions line up with how I would tag it, too. I'm
curious where you heard about the Class I, II, III designations,
though. I'm a California native and occasional bike rider and I've
never heard of these.
Karl
Here's the detail on their classification in California. I'm not
sure if the same is used elsewhere in the US though:
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=shc&group=00001-01000&file=890-894.2
Will
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
