Spencer Riddile wrote:
> Chris,
>
> What would the advantage/disadvantage be of using a different network
> name ("usbrs" vs. "ncn") for U.S. bike routes. The author of open cycle
> map would have to adjust their symbolization if we started using
> "usbrs". Is it good to try to keep some international standard even
> though trail and route systems may be different in various ways.Plus there are areas in the US that are already using the ncn/rcn/lcn convention so cyclemap renders things properly. This breaks down pretty nicely for cycleways that front US and Interstates as well as the 2 designated NCNs in the US (as ncn), state owned routes as rcn and city and county maintained routes as LCN (such as the 40 Mile Loop and Portland/Salem/Eugene's bicycle boulevards and city greenways).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
