On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 21:53 -0400, Mike N. wrote: > Keep in mind for the change detection algorithm, that a few users do not > realize that it is good to remove the tiger:reviewed=no after verifying or > correcting a way.
Heh, that's why I didn't mention tiger:reviewed=no: it's not consistently useful. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
