On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Shaun McDonald <sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote: > Going back to the original question, each shop should be it's own node or > area, thus the problem of multiple names isn't an issue any more. You place > the nodes of the shops roughly where they are within the shopping centre. > If you do have something that has multiple names, you are better stating > what the name is. For example if a bridge has a name, you could use name= > for the street name that runs on top of the bridge, and name:bridge for the > name of the bridge itself. I'm sure there are better examples. > Shaun
If we used separate nodes, it could be possible to associated them all together and with the building using a relation. For the various pieces of a Wal-mart, I would use the "site" relation. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site -Kate > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > Talk-us@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us > > _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
