Zeke Farwell wrote: >> >> In this case, I'd say the renderer is right. Both access=private and >> access=no mean essentially the same thing - you aren't allowed there without >> explicit approval. In the case of access=no, that approval happens to come >> from a government agency, but I see no reason that needs to be drawn >> differently. > > > I disagree, perhaps access=private and access=no do mean the same thing, but > in that case access=no is not a good option for a closed bridge. There are > two distinct situations: > > 1. A road/bridge is private and access is only allowed for specified > users. Condition of the road is fine, so even if you are not allowed, you > could choose to break the rules and use the road/bridge as long as there is > no gate. > 2. A road/bridge is closed because it is unsafe, under construction, or > impassible. Even if you are granted access, it would not be desirable to > use said road/bridge.
Are we trying to create a usable map, or replace common sense? I propose we focus on the former. If we focus on the latter, we'll never acheive the former. _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
